During my tenure as a dealer principle, I had a conversation with an office equipment leasing company executive. We were discussing the return of a large population of multi-function copy equipment from a mutual customer. For this customer, my dealership had stayed on top of all the lease requirements for notification of intent to return equipment at lease expiration. On my customer's behalf, I was making the arrangements for the return of the equipment. The leasing company executive was reluctant to provide return authorization information for the equipment.
Venture leasing enjoys many advantages over traditional venture capital and bank financing. Financing new ventures can be a high risk business. Venture capitalists generally demand sizeable equity stakes in the companies they finance to compensate for this risk. They typically seek investment returns of at least 35% - 50% on their unsecured, non-amortizing equity investments. An IPO or other sale of their equity position within three to six years of investing offers them the best avenue to capture this return. Many venture capitalists require board representation, specific exit time frames and/or investor rights to force a 'liquidity' event. In comparison, venture leasing has none of these drawbacks. Venture lessors typically seek an annual return in the 14% - 20% range. These transactions usually amortize monthly in two to four years and are secured by the underlying assets. Although the risk to the venture lessor is also high, this risk is mitigated by requiring collateral and structuring a transaction that amortizes. By using venture leasing and venture capital together, the savvy entrepreneur lowers the venture's overall capital cost, builds enterprise value faster and preserves ownership. Venture leasing is also very flexible. By structuring a fair market value purchase or renewal option at the end of the lease, the start-up can slash monthly payments. Lower payments result in higher earnings and cash flow. Since a fair market value option is not an obligation, the lessee has a high degree of flexibility and control. The resulting reduction in payments and shift of lease expense beyond the expiry of the transaction can deliver a higher enterprise value to the savvy entrepreneur during the initial term of the lease. The higher enterprise value results from the start-up's ability to achieve higher earnings, upon which most valuations are based. Customers benefit more from venture leasing as compared to traditional bank financing in two ways. First, venture leases are usually only secured by the underlying equipment. Additionally, there are usually no restrictive financial covenants. Most banks, if they lend to early stage companies, require blanket liens on all of the companies' assets. In some cases, they also require guarantees of the start-ups' principals. More and more, sophisticated entrepreneurs recognize the stifling effects of these limitations and their impact on growth. When start-ups need additional financing and a sole lender has encumbered all company assets or required guarantees, these young companies become less attractive to other financing sources. Correcting this situation can sap the entrepreneurs' time and energy.
I asked the executive how they could be so sure that equipment would go into renewal. Without hesitating, he answered because historically most of their equipment leases do. After getting up off the floor, I asked his opinion why that many leases went into renewal. He replied that it was either the lack of tracking the lease expiration or turnover in the customer position that was responsible for notifying the lease company in a specific time frame (designated within the lease agreement). The majority of copier leases are written for a 5-year lease term. Turnover (either promotions or by leaving) within a customer's business does usually occur before the end of the lease. In addition, during the course of busy days at the office, no one stops to document lease expiration dates. It seems so far away and therefore unnecessary at the time.
Leasing companies do frequently (usually quarterly) send equipment vendors a list of their lease portfolios with that leasing company in hopes the vendor will upgrade the customer's equipment and extend the customer's leasing relationship with the leasing company. If the equipment vendor is paying attention to their customer base, they will notify you of the approaching lease expiration (and try to upgrade your equipment). If an equipment lease renews, this makes it very difficult (read expensive) for a competing equipment vendor to economically upgrade the equipment before the expiration of the renewal term. This strategy was constructed intentionally to give the incumbent equipment vendor (and leasing company) a financial advantage in upgrading the equipment before the expiration of the renewal lease term. A lease renewal limits your options, which is never good for you. Only the incumbent equipment vendor who agrees to use the same leasing company can upgrade equipment on a renewed lease without penalty. Any other combination of equipment vendor and/or leasing company will have to pay the remaining payments of the renewed lease term (usually 12 months).
Many landlords offer a tenant "build out allowance" as an inducement to lease the premises. These sums, however, do not represent "free" money and landlord's payment of the allowance is tied to specific conditions in the lease. For example, if the tenant breaches the lease and abandons the premises prior to the end of the lease term, the tenant may have to repay the build out allowance, along with landlord's other damages. The tenant should make sure it understands when and under what circumstances the build out allowance will be paid. Additionally, the tenant should understand his "lease commencement date" and "lease expiration date". The lease commencement date may or may not be on the date tenant occupies the premises. Also, the landlord may have promised the tenant a 60 month term but the lease could provide a fixed expiration date for a term of less than 60 months. Again, careful scrutiny of the lease is required.
Satisfied that the business model is sound, the venture lessor's greatest concern is whether the start-up has sufficient liquidity or cash on hand to support a significant portion of the lease term. If the venture fails to raise additional capital or runs out of cash, the lessor is not likely to collect further lease payments. To mitigate this risk, most experienced venture lessors pursue start-ups with at least nine months of cash or sufficient liquid assets to service a substantial portion of their leases.
Venture leasing enjoys many advantages over traditional venture capital and bank financing. Financing new ventures can be a high risk business. Venture capitalists generally demand sizeable equity stakes in the companies they finance to compensate for this risk. They typically seek investment returns of at least 35% - 50% on their unsecured, non-amortizing equity investments. An IPO or other sale of their equity position within three to six years of investing offers them the best avenue to capture this return. Many venture capitalists require board representation, specific exit time frames and/or investor rights to force a 'liquidity' event. In comparison, venture leasing has none of these drawbacks. Venture lessors typically seek an annual return in the 14% - 20% range. These transactions usually amortize monthly in two to four years and are secured by the underlying assets. Although the risk to the venture lessor is also high, this risk is mitigated by requiring collateral and structuring a transaction that amortizes. By using venture leasing and venture capital together, the savvy entrepreneur lowers the venture's overall capital cost, builds enterprise value faster and preserves ownership. Venture leasing is also very flexible. By structuring a fair market value purchase or renewal option at the end of the lease, the start-up can slash monthly payments. Lower payments result in higher earnings and cash flow. Since a fair market value option is not an obligation, the lessee has a high degree of flexibility and control. The resulting reduction in payments and shift of lease expense beyond the expiry of the transaction can deliver a higher enterprise value to the savvy entrepreneur during the initial term of the lease. The higher enterprise value results from the start-up's ability to achieve higher earnings, upon which most valuations are based. Customers benefit more from venture leasing as compared to traditional bank financing in two ways. First, venture leases are usually only secured by the underlying equipment. Additionally, there are usually no restrictive financial covenants. Most banks, if they lend to early stage companies, require blanket liens on all of the companies' assets. In some cases, they also require guarantees of the start-ups' principals. More and more, sophisticated entrepreneurs recognize the stifling effects of these limitations and their impact on growth. When start-ups need additional financing and a sole lender has encumbered all company assets or required guarantees, these young companies become less attractive to other financing sources. Correcting this situation can sap the entrepreneurs' time and energy.
I asked the executive how they could be so sure that equipment would go into renewal. Without hesitating, he answered because historically most of their equipment leases do. After getting up off the floor, I asked his opinion why that many leases went into renewal. He replied that it was either the lack of tracking the lease expiration or turnover in the customer position that was responsible for notifying the lease company in a specific time frame (designated within the lease agreement). The majority of copier leases are written for a 5-year lease term. Turnover (either promotions or by leaving) within a customer's business does usually occur before the end of the lease. In addition, during the course of busy days at the office, no one stops to document lease expiration dates. It seems so far away and therefore unnecessary at the time.
Leasing companies do frequently (usually quarterly) send equipment vendors a list of their lease portfolios with that leasing company in hopes the vendor will upgrade the customer's equipment and extend the customer's leasing relationship with the leasing company. If the equipment vendor is paying attention to their customer base, they will notify you of the approaching lease expiration (and try to upgrade your equipment). If an equipment lease renews, this makes it very difficult (read expensive) for a competing equipment vendor to economically upgrade the equipment before the expiration of the renewal term. This strategy was constructed intentionally to give the incumbent equipment vendor (and leasing company) a financial advantage in upgrading the equipment before the expiration of the renewal lease term. A lease renewal limits your options, which is never good for you. Only the incumbent equipment vendor who agrees to use the same leasing company can upgrade equipment on a renewed lease without penalty. Any other combination of equipment vendor and/or leasing company will have to pay the remaining payments of the renewed lease term (usually 12 months).
Many landlords offer a tenant "build out allowance" as an inducement to lease the premises. These sums, however, do not represent "free" money and landlord's payment of the allowance is tied to specific conditions in the lease. For example, if the tenant breaches the lease and abandons the premises prior to the end of the lease term, the tenant may have to repay the build out allowance, along with landlord's other damages. The tenant should make sure it understands when and under what circumstances the build out allowance will be paid. Additionally, the tenant should understand his "lease commencement date" and "lease expiration date". The lease commencement date may or may not be on the date tenant occupies the premises. Also, the landlord may have promised the tenant a 60 month term but the lease could provide a fixed expiration date for a term of less than 60 months. Again, careful scrutiny of the lease is required.
Satisfied that the business model is sound, the venture lessor's greatest concern is whether the start-up has sufficient liquidity or cash on hand to support a significant portion of the lease term. If the venture fails to raise additional capital or runs out of cash, the lessor is not likely to collect further lease payments. To mitigate this risk, most experienced venture lessors pursue start-ups with at least nine months of cash or sufficient liquid assets to service a substantial portion of their leases.
About the Author:
Frank Miller has a Debt Consolidation Blog & Finance, these are some of the articles: Silver: A Volatile Market You have full permission to reprint this article provided this box is kept unchanged.
No comments:
Post a Comment